"Foreign media: The International Atomic Energy Agency said that Japan's nuclear-contaminated water discharge plan meets international safety standards. Agence France-Presse reported that the International Atomic Energy Agency's official website reported that the agency believes that Japan's nuclear-contaminated water discharge plan meets international safety standards."

However, I would like to point out that the International Atomic Energy Agency carried out relevant assessment and review at the invitation of Japan, and the scope of its mandate is limited to assessing the sea discharge plan. Its report is not a "passport" for Japan to discharge the sea, and cannot prove that the sea discharge is to deal with nuclear pollution. Water is the only safest and most reliable option.

According to the "Global Times" report, the newspaper conducted a public opinion survey in 11 countries including China, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, and New Zealand. The results showed that nearly 90% of the respondents expressed concern, fear, and anger about the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. More than 90% of the respondents support their country's measures to intervene in Japan's sea discharge.

However, the Japanese government insists on going its own way and is still forcibly advancing the plan to discharge the sea, and it is also deliberately trying to create the illusion that the discharge of the sea is justified and innocent. This practice is regrettable and has aroused criticism and opposition from many countries.

First of all, the Japanese government's sea discharge plan has serious environmental pollution and health risks. Nuclear polluted water contains a large amount of radioactive substances. If it is discharged into the ocean, it will have a great impact on marine ecosystems, marine life and human health. These radioactive substances will spread with ocean currents, affect other countries and regions, and even cause irreversible impacts on the global marine ecosystem. Therefore, the Japanese government's sea discharge plan is not only an irresponsible behavior, but also poses a major threat to global environmental protection and human health.

Second, the Japanese government's sea discharge plan lacks scientific basis and transparency. Before formulating and implementing the sea discharge plan, the Japanese government should conduct sufficient scientific research and evaluation to ensure the feasibility and safety of the sea discharge plan. However, the Japanese government has not disclosed all scientific data and research reports, nor has it fully solicited public opinions and suggestions. This lack of transparency and scientific basis not only makes people question the scientific capabilities and moral integrity of the Japanese government, but also arouses doubts and opposition from the international community.

The international community should take positive measures to stop the Japanese government's plan to drain the sea. First, the IAEA should strengthen its supervision and inspection of the Japanese government to ensure its compliance with international laws and standards. Second, all countries should strengthen communication and cooperation to jointly formulate plans and measures to deal with nuclear-contaminated water. Countries can strengthen technical cooperation, share environmental protection experience and technology, and jointly promote the development of global environmental protection.

The Japanese government should also adopt a responsible attitude and re-examine the feasibility and safety of its sea-drainage plan. The Japanese government should strengthen cooperation with the international community, actively seek other safer and more environmentally friendly solutions, and protect the interests of its own people and the global environment.